The use of carbon capture and storage technology in diesel locomotive exhaust systems and in the robotic planting of green spaces around facilities under construction
How to cite
Abstract
This study is devoted to a comprehensive analysis of the effectiveness and economic feasibility of integrating carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies into diesel locomotive exhaust systems in combination with robotic planting systems for green spaces around infrastructure facilities under construction. The paper presents a multiparametric model developed by the author for estimating the carbon balance in the implementation of these technologies at railway transport and construction facilities. The methodological basis of the research includes a systematic analysis of the technical and economic parameters of existing CCS technologies, field tests of modified exhaust systems on existing rolling stock, as well as experimental verification of the effectiveness of robotic landing systems in various climatic and ground conditions. The results of the study demonstrate a 37.8% reduction in the carbon footprint with the integrated implementation of the developed technological solutions, savings of up to 24.5% in operational resources and a 68.3% reduction in landscaping time compared to traditional methods. The developed protocols for adapting CCS systems to the operating conditions of diesel locomotives have shown technological stability in a wide range of loads and climatic conditions. The economic analysis revealed the profitability of the proposed model in the medium term with a payback period of 4.7 years with government support for green technologies. The innovative approaches presented in the study have the potential to scale across various sectors of the transportation and construction industries, contributing to the achievement of national and international goals for decarbonization of the economy.
Keywords
References
1. Баринов В.А., Лунин К.А. Перспективы развития технологий улавливания и хранения углерода в электроэнергетике России // Электрические станции. 2022. № 5. С. 2-11.
2. Башмаков И.А. Стратегия низкоуглеродного развития российской экономики // Вопросы экономики. 2020. № 7. С. 51-74.
3. Конопляник А.А. Декарбонизация газовой отрасли в Европе и перспективы для России // Вопросы экономики. 2022. № 2. С. 49-68.
4. Макаров И.А., Степанов И.А. Парижское климатическое соглашение: влияние на мировую энергетику и вызовы для России // Вестник международных организаций. 2018. Т. 13. № 2. С. 55-69.
5. Порфирьев Б.Н., Широв А.А., Колпаков А.Ю. Стратегия низкоуглеродного развития: перспективы для экономики России // Мировая экономика и международные отношения. 2020. Т. 64. № 9. С. 15-25.
6. Bui M., Adjiman C.S., Bardow A. Carbon capture and storage (CCS): the way forward // Energy & environmental science. 2018. Vol. 11. pp. 1062-1176.
7. Fajardy M., Mac Dowell N. Can BECCS deliver sustainable and resource efficient negative emissions? // Energy & environmental science. 2017. Vol. 10. pp. 1389-1426.
8. Fuss S., Lamb W.F., Callaghan M.W. Negative emissions – Part 2: Costs, potentials and side effects // Environmental research letters. 2018. Vol. 13. pp. 2-63.
9. Global Status of CCS 2023: The pivotal climate solution. Melbourne: Global CCS Institute, 2023. 92 p.
10. Griscom B.W., Adams J., Ellis P.W. Natural climate solutions // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2017. Vol. 114(44). pp. 11645-11650.
11. Lee S.Y., Park S.J. A review on solid adsorbents for carbon dioxide capture // Journal of industrial and engineering chemistry. 2015. Vol. 23. pp. 1-11.
12. Li X., Wei N., Liu Y. CO2 point emission and geological storage capacity in China // Energy рrocedia. 2009. Vol. 1(1). рр. 2793-2800.
13. Mac Dowell N., Fennell P.S., Shah N., Maitland G.C. The role of CO2 capture and utilization in mitigating climate change // Nature climate change. 2017. Vol. 7. pp. 243-249.
14. Net zero by 2050: A roadmap for the global energy sector. Paris: International Energy Agency (IEA), 2021. 224 p.
15. Xu X., Liu W. Carbon capture and storage as a climate strategy: reality check and prospect // Climate policy. 2021. Vol. 21(6). pp. 845-856.