CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECTURE

Research on methods for reducing costs in construction production based on the improvement of organizational and technological solutions in construction architecture

Authors

  • Andrei V. Reshetnikov National Research Moscow State University of Civil Engineering, 26 Yaroslavskoye Shosse, Moscow, 129337, Russia
  • Aleksey A. Luzgin National Research Moscow State University of Civil Engineering, 26 Yaroslavskoye Shosse, Moscow, 129337, Russia
  • Nikita A. Doroshko National Research Moscow State University of Civil Engineering, 26 Yaroslavskoye Shosse, Moscow, 129337, Russia
  • Vladislav L. Balakin National Research Moscow State University of Civil Engineering, 26 Yaroslavskoye Shosse, Moscow, 129337, Russia
  • Roman A. Kuzmin National Research Moscow State University of Civil Engineering, 26 Yaroslavskoye Shosse, Moscow, 129337, Russia

How to cite

GOST Reshetnikov A. V., Luzgin A. A., Doroshko N. A., Balakin V. L., Kuzmin R. A. Research on methods for reducing costs in construction production based on the improvement of organizational and technological solutions in construction architecture // STROITEL'NYE I DOROZHNYE MASHINY. 2026. Vol. 70. No. 2. P. 20-32.
APA Reshetnikov, A. V., Luzgin, A. A., Doroshko, N. A., Balakin, V. L. & Kuzmin, R. A. (2026). Research on methods for reducing costs in construction production based on the improvement of organizational and technological solutions in construction architecture. STROITEL'NYE I DOROZHNYE MASHINY, 70(2), 20-32.

Abstract

Modern construction production under conditions of rising resource prices is characterized by a significant dependence of unit costs on architectural decisions that determine the organizational and technological parameters of facility erection at all stages of the life cycle. A comprehensive analysis of the interrelationships between the space-planning characteristics of buildings and indicators of resource intensity reveals key factors that enable substantial cost optimization without reducing architectural quality. The compactness of the space-planning solution, quantitatively assessed by the ratio of the area of external structures to the building volume, demonstrates a pronounced positive correlation with the specific cost of construction and installation works at the level of 0.78 and a coefficient of determination of 0.61. The transition from low to high values of the compactness coefficient is accompanied by a 30 percent increase in costs and a 30.7 percent increase in labor intensity. The degree of unification of structural elements, reflecting the repeatability of standard sizes, provides an inverse relationship with the cost of load-bearing structures, where an increase in the unification coefficient leads to a 24.3 percent reduction in specific costs, a 33.3 percent decrease in the duration of the above-ground cycle, and a 50 percent increase in productivity, as confirmed by Spearman’s rank correlation of –0.82. The regularity of the building’s planning structure, assessed on a scale, contributes to optimization of the flow organization of works, an increase in the coefficient of process combination to 0.72, and a reduction in deviations from normative deadlines, which decreases overhead costs by 37.2 percent between the extreme groups. A multifactor regression model that includes the indicated parameters explains 79 percent of the variation in specific cost with a mean approximation error of 6.3 percent, indicating a combined potential for cost reduction of 18–23 percent under comprehensive optimization. The choice of facade systems additionally influences overall project economics, with plaster solutions providing minimal specific costs compared to brick cladding, a difference that reaches 95 percent in cost and is accompanied by indirect effects on foundations. The integration of organizational and technological modeling into architectural design through information technologies and digital twins enables iterative assessment of the cost implications of decisions at early stages, facilitating the transition to concurrent design and minimization of deviations in actual cost. The identified quantitative patterns emphasize the necessity of coordinating architectural concepts with technological capabilities, thereby opening prospects for increasing the efficiency of the industry through the systematic consideration of resource constraints in design solutions.

Keywords

Cost reduction in construction organizational and technological solutions architectural and construction design compactness of space-planning solution unification of structural elements

References

Батуева М.И., Зонова А.Н., Алексеева Н.А. Поточный метод организации строительного производства // Экономика и управление: проблемы, решения. 2024. Т. 5, № 6 (147). С. 62-68.

Величкин В.З., Петроченко М.В., Птухина И.С., Городишенина А.Ю. Методика оптимизации затрат строительных компаний при реализации общей технологии возведения объекта // Известия вузов. Инвестиции. Строительство. Недвижимость. 2022. Т. 12, № 1 (40). С. 20-27.

Волков А.А., Силка Д.Н., Лебедев К.А. Совершенствование подходов к управлению затратами в строительстве // Экономика и предпринимательство. 2017. № 4-2 (81). С. 500-503.

Волков С.В. Влияние параметров строительного потока на организационно технологические решения строительства жилых зданий // Вестник гражданских инженеров. 2013. № 2 (37). С. 110-116.

Герасимов В.В., Щербаков А.Н. Направления развития подготовки строительного производства в условиях рынка // Известия высших учебных заведений. Строительство. 1996. № 1. С. 63-66.

Герасимова В.А., Зотикова О.Н. Факторы снижения затрат в строительстве // Экономика и предпринимательство. 2016. № 2-1 (67). С. 588-591.

Жадановский Б.В., Ерижокова Е.С., Горшкова Е.А. Поточный метод как способ организации строительства // Системные технологии. 2018. № 3 (28). С. 136-140.

Караогланов В.Г. Оценка эффективности организационно-технологических решений реконструкции зданий // Промышленное и гражданское строительство. 2006. № 12. С. 47-48.

Костюченко В.В. Управление процессом повышения эффективности организационно технологических строительных систем // Инженерный вестник Дона. 2012. № 1 (19). С. 536-542.

Лим В.Г., Воеводин И.Г., Акопян А.Н., Клещев С.И., Нещадимов В.И. Решение организационно-технологических задач строительного производства в информационной среде // Южно-российский вестник геологии, географии и глобальной энергии. 2005. № 3 (12). С. 173-177.

Навметов Р.З. Совершенствование методов организации строительного контроля путем внедрения цифровых технологий // Проблемы научной мысли. 2019. Т. 5, № 4. С. 9-11.

Основные направления повышения эффективности строительной отрасли на современном этапе // Безопасность труда в промышленности. 2011. № 2. С. 84-87.

Пацюк Д.Ф. Моделирование эффективного механизма управления затратами строительного предприятия в посткризисный период // Вестник Российской академии естественных наук (Санкт-Петербург). 2013. № 3. С. 27-28.

Полякова И.Ю. Влияние методов производства и способов организации работ на сметную стоимость возведения зданий // Новые идеи нового века: материалы международной научной конференции ФАД ТОГУ. 2007. Т. 1. С. 144-147.

Резниченко В.С., Ленинцев Н.Н., Мизюн В.А. Организационно-экономические проблемы и механизмы снижения стоимости строительной продукции // Экономика строительства. 2006. № 1. С. 13-25.

Issue

Section

CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECTURE

Metrics

190 views
0 downloads
Want to publish with us?
Submit an article

Machine-readable metadata

Similar Articles

<< < 3 4 5 6 7 8 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)