DESIGN AND MODELING

Mathematical modeling of wildfire spread and water suppression in a three-tier forest stand

Authors

  • Liliya Yu. Kataeva https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9217-9324 Nizhny Novgorod Institute of Railway Transport – Branch of the Volga State University of Railway Transport; R.E. Alekseev Nizhny Novgorod State Technical University, 603011, Nizhny Novgorod, Komsomolskaya Square, 3
  • Timofey S. Kiselev R.E. Alekseev Nizhny Novgorod State Technical University, 603155, Nizhny Novgorod, Minina St., 24

How to cite

GOST Kataeva L. Y., Kiselev T. S. Mathematical modeling of wildfire spread and water suppression in a three-tier forest stand // STROITEL'NYE I DOROZHNYE MASHINY. 2026. Vol. 70. No. 9. P. 104-116. DOI: 10.25726/k1582-1947-4677-v
APA Kataeva, L. Y. & Kiselev, T. S. (2026). Mathematical modeling of wildfire spread and water suppression in a three-tier forest stand. STROITEL'NYE I DOROZHNYE MASHINY, 70(9), 104-116. https://doi.org/10.25726/k1582-1947-4677-v

Abstract

A physical-mathematical and analytical model is presented for the spread and water suppression of a forest fire in a three-tier forest stand. The model is based on the mechanics of reacting multiphase media, where the gas phase is described by the density ρ₅ and mass concentrations Cα, the condensed phase by the volume fractions φᵢ, and free water by φ₄, the source term f(x,z,t), and the boiling rate R₄. The considered vertical structure consists of a 4 m lower combustible tier, a 1 m non-combustible inter-tier gap, and a 5 m upper combustible tier. Integral height averaging of the two-dimensional model is performed for each tier, while retaining inter-tier heat fluxes. It is shown that the middle layer does not form an independent combustion wave, but acts as a thermal bridge between the lower and upper reaction zones. For the combustible tiers, an analytical travelling-wave solution is obtained, together with a suppression condition expressed through the critical boiling rate of water. It is proved that, when all three tiers have identical properties, the system degenerates into the known solution for a homogeneous combustion wave in a porous layer. Numerical fields without suppression give fire-front propagation velocities of 3.10 m/s for the continuous forest stand and 3.41 m/s for the three-tier stand. The 10% increase in the three-tier case is caused by wind-driven displacement of the upper high-temperature zone, bending of the front in the inter-tier gap, and enhanced heating of the upper tier. The analytical model shows that water supply to the lower tier suppresses the near-ground wave, but may fail to destroy thermal coupling with the upper tier; water supply to the inter-tier gap weakens the thermal bridge; water supply to the upper tier lowers the crown-zone temperature, but leaves the lower pyrolysis source active. The results justify the need to account for water-supply height and vertical forest structure when selecting a suppression strategy.

Keywords

wildfire three-tier forest reacting media mechanics free water combustion wave height averaging fuel-strata gap water suppression

Funding

The authors did not declare any external funding for this research.

References

Grishin A.M., Penenko V.V. Mathematical modeling of forest fires and new methods of fighting them. Ed. V.V. Penenko. Novosibirsk: Nauka, Siberian Branch, 1992. 404 pp.

Loshchilova N.A. Mathematical modeling of the impact of a given water flow on the dynamics of forest fires and determination of parameters necessary for successful firefighting: dis. … cand. phys.-math. sci. Nizhny Novgorod, 2014. 123 pp.

Baranovskiy N.V., Kirienko V.A. Mathematical simulation of forest fuel pyrolysis and crown forest fire impact for forest fire danger and risk assessment // Processes. 2022. Vol. 10. no. 3. Article 483.

Cobian-Iniguez J., Weise D.R., Princevac M. The transition and spread of a chaparral crown fire // Fire Technology. 2022. Vol. 58. pp. 1897-1920.

Dickman L.T., Jonko A.K., Linn R.R., Altintas I., Atchley A.L., Bär A., Collins A.D., Dupuy J.L., Gallagher M.R., Hiers J.K., Hoffman C.M., Hood S.M., Hurteau M.D., Jolly W.M., Josephson A., Loudermilk E.L., Ma W., Michaletz S.T., Nolan R.H., Younes N. Integrating plant physiology into simulation of fire behavior and effects // New Phytologist. 2023. Vol. 238. no. 3. pp. 952-970.

Forthofer J. M., Finney M. A., Grumstrup T. P., Ahmed M. M., Trouvé A. LIHTFire: A high-resolution 1D physics-based wildfire spread model // Proceedings of the IX International Conference on Forest Fire Research Ed. D.X. Viegas. 2022. 5 p. https://research.fs.usda.gov/sites/default/files/2024-01/firelab-forthofer_finney_etal_lihtfire_v1.2.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Grasso P., Innocente M.S. Physics-based model of wildfire propagation towards faster-than-real-time simulations // Computers and Mathematics with Applications. 2020. Vol. 80. no. 5. pp. 790-808.

Kataeva L.Yu., Maslennikov D.A., Loshchilova N.A. On the laws of combustion wave suppression by free water in a homogeneous porous layer of organic combustible materials // Fluid Dynamics. 2016. Vol. 51. no. 3. pp. 389-399.

Kropotova S.S., Dorokhov V.V., Sviridenko A.V., Strizhak P.A. Composition of the gas-air mixture in the containment and suppression of forest fires with promising extinguishing agents // Forests. 2023. Vol. 14. no. 4. Article 786.

Kuznetsov G., Ponomarev K., Zhakharevich A. Characteristics of moisture release from layers of forest fuels with typical fire extinguishing agents // Thermal Science. 2022. Vol. 26. no. 1B. pp. 593-604.

Navas-Montilla A., Reisch C., Diaz P., Ozgen-Xian I. Modeling wildfire dynamics through a physics-based approach incorporating fuel moisture and landscape heterogeneity // Environmental Modelling and Software. 2025. Vol. 192. Article 106511.

Ponomarev K.O., Sviridenko A.S., Zhdanova A.O. Characteristics of the process of extinguishing ground-level forest fires under conditions of varying concentrations of aerosol-based fire-suppressant agents // Fire and Emergencies: Prevention, Elimination. 2022. Vol 15. no. 2. pp. 55-66.

Ritter S.M., Hoffman C.M., Battaglia M.A., Linn R., Mell W.E. Vertical and Horizontal Crown Fuel Continuity Influences Group-Scale Ignition and Fuel Consumption // Fire. 2023. Vol. 6. no. 8. Article 321.

Sharaf M., Sutherland D., Wadhwani R., Moinuddin K. Thresholds of surface fire transition to crown fire: effects of wind speed and crown base height with fixed moisture content // Fire Safety Journal. 2025. Vol. 158. Article 104545.

Singh H., Ang L.-M., Lewis T., Paudyal D., Acuna M., Srivastava P.K., Srivastava S.K. Trending and emerging prospects of physics-based and ML-based wildfire spread models: a comprehensive review // Journal of Forestry Research. 2024. Vol. 35. no. 1. Article 135.

Tutland N.J., Wion A.P., May C.J., Hutchings G.R., Nowak H.A., Gattiker J.R., Hiers J.K., Linn R.R., Pokswinski S.M., Margolis E.Q. Representing three-dimensional fuels for physics-based fire behavior models: a general framework and case study in a type-converted post-fire shrubfield // Fire Ecology. 2025. Vol. 21. Article 43.

Volkov R.S., Kuznetsov G.V., Strizhak P.A. Movement of water drops in a forest fuel layer in the course of its thermal decomposition // Thermal Science. 2018. Vol. 22. no. 1. pp. 301-312.

Zhdanova A.O., Kuznetsov G.V., Volkov R.S., Khasanov I.R. Suppressing the thermal decomposition of forest fuel using the different water spraying schemes // Thermal Science. 2019. Vol. 23. no. 5B. pp. 3263-3273.

Issue

Section

DESIGN AND MODELING

Metrics

36 views
0 downloads
Want to publish with us?
Submit an article