DESIGN AND MODELING

Use of artificial intelligence for risk forecasting and optimization of construction project implementation processes

Authors

  • Yulia A. Basalaeva Gubkin Russian State University of Oil and Gas (National Research University), 65 Leninsky Prospekt, bldg. 1, Moscow, 119991, Russia

How to cite

GOST Basalaeva Y. A. Use of artificial intelligence for risk forecasting and optimization of construction project implementation processes // STROITEL'NYE I DOROZHNYE MASHINY. 2026. Vol. 70. No. 7. P. 149-159. DOI: 10.25726/p8663-8081-3492-o
APA Basalaeva, Y. A. (2026). Use of artificial intelligence for risk forecasting and optimization of construction project implementation processes. STROITEL'NYE I DOROZHNYE MASHINY, 70(7), 149-159. https://doi.org/10.25726/p8663-8081-3492-o

Abstract

Risk forecasting and the reduction of deviations in schedule and cost remain a weak point in the delivery of construction projects, where a noticeable share of facilities is completed with overruns of planned indicators. The gap between deterministic schedule-and-estimate calculation and the probabilistic nature of deviations produces a systematic underestimation of reserves. The aim of the study is to quantify the contribution of a machine-learning predictive layer, embedded into planning and operational management, to the reduction of project deviations. On an author's simulation model of a monolithic-frame residential facility with a planned cost of 2,847.3 million rubles and a duration of 26 months, a Monte-Carlo calculation (10,000 iterations) was performed over eight risk factors, supplemented by a comparison of four algorithms for forecasting the final cost and by a variance decomposition of the factor contribution. The baseline scenario yields an average estimate overrun of 6,4% and a schedule overrun of 2,2 months, with an 80th percentile of 10,3% and 30.4 months. Connecting the predictive layer lowers the average overrun to 3,4% and the average delay to 1,1 months, cutting the expected deviations roughly by half. The integral indicator shows the highest sensitivity to the financing-rate risk and to supply disruption, which together form more than 40% of the variance of the final cost. The distribution of the factor contribution shows that the effect of predictive algorithms is achieved by re-tuning already applied procedures of schedule and cost control, without a separate management block.

Keywords

artificial intelligence machine learning construction project management risk forecasting simulation modelling Monte-Carlo method schedule optimization estimated cost

References

Antipov S.S., Burkovskiy V.L. Problems of risk management within construction production based on the fuzzy logic apparatus // Voronezh State Technical University Bulletin. 2025. Vol. 21. № 3. pp. 66-74.

Barkalov S.A., Moiseev S.I., Serebryakova E.A. Risk management models in the construction sphere based on Markov random processes // Control Systems and Information Technologies. 2023. № 4 (94). pp. 31-35.

Bovteev S.V., Kashcheev N.A., Perevedentsev G.A., Pisareva K.A. Application of artificial intelligence in the management of construction projects // Economics of Construction. 2025. № 10. pp. 54-57.

Boychenko O.V., Fadina Yu.Yu. Digital transformation of the economy of construction: the role of artificial intelligence in forecasting risks and resources // Economics of Construction and Environmental Management. 2025. № 1 (94). pp. 84-91.

Gureev M.V., Makarov A.N. A model for forecasting material resources and estimated cost at the early stages of the life cycle of construction facilities // Moscow State University of Civil Engineering Bulletin. 2024. Vol. 19. № 11. pp. 1835-1849.

Zabaykin Yu.V., Mashkin D.M. Use of neural networks for predicting the schedule and budget in projects of construction of power facilities // Economics of Construction. 2023. № 12. pp. 102-105.

Zinchenko N.E., Kashina E.S., Ishkulov D.S., Gabova V.V. Possibilities of construction risk assessment at the design stage // Engineering Journal of Don. 2025. № 5 (125). pp. 522-533.

Kaborda A.V., Lapidus A.A., Ageeva Ya.D. Methods of introducing artificial intelligence in the formation of construction work schedules // Novosibirsk State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering (Sibstrin) Proceedings. 2025. Vol. 28. № 3 (97). pp. 42-55.

Korkishko A.N., Isenov B.N., Yaroslavtsev A.I. Use of artificial intelligence at facilities constructed on an oilfield: effective management and risk reduction // Components of Scientific and Technological Progress. 2024. № 8 (98). pp. 18-24.

Kuzubov A.A. Artificial intelligence technologies as a tool of project management in construction // Scientific Review: Theory and Practice. 2025. Vol. 15. № 3 (115). pp. 310-317.

Magomedov G.A. Application of artificial intelligence for the optimization of construction processes: design, management and automation of work // Nanotechnologies: Science and Production. 2025. № 1. pp. 103-111.

Makievskiy S.E., Yudin A.V., Grosheva P.Yu., Yakovlev M.S. Integration of artificial intelligence algorithms into the management of construction projects // Computational Nanotechnology. 2024. Vol. 11. № S5. pp. 37-46.

Masaleva M.V., Borulko V.G., Romanova G.M., Filkova A.P. Development of complex project management models in construction organizations taking into account digitalization and the introduction of artificial intelligence // Economics of Construction. 2025. № 4. pp. 122-125.

Chekardovskiy S.M., Chekardovskaya I.A., Burtsev A.P. Problems of artificial intelligence in construction // Proceedings of the Southwest State University. 2025. Vol. 29. № 1. pp. 27-39.

Shishkina D.N. Assessment of the economic efficiency of the application of artificial intelligence in construction: choosing the optimal method // MGSU Bulletin. 2024. Vol. 19. № 9. pp. 1550-1561.

Issue

Section

DESIGN AND MODELING

Metrics

48 views
0 downloads
Want to publish with us?
Submit an article

Machine-readable metadata

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.