APPLIED RESEARCH

Automated planning and coordination of construction machinery complexes in a changing production environment

Authors

  • Maxim A. Serkov Gubkin Russian State University of Oil and Gas (National Research University), 65 Leninsky Prospekt, bldg. 1, Moscow, 119991, Russia

How to cite

GOST Serkov M. A. Automated planning and coordination of construction machinery complexes in a changing production environment // STROITEL'NYE I DOROZHNYE MASHINY. 2026. Vol. 70. No. 7. P. 337-351. DOI: 10.25726/q3165-6777-4064-k
APA Serkov, M. A. (2026). Automated planning and coordination of construction machinery complexes in a changing production environment. STROITEL'NYE I DOROZHNYE MASHINY, 70(7), 337-351. https://doi.org/10.25726/q3165-6777-4064-k

Abstract

Construction schedules for mechanized earthworks rest on deterministic elemental estimating norms, whereas the set of operable machines, the availability of work faces and the haulage cycle time change within a single shift. The gap between the normative model and the variability of the production environment generates organizational losses whose magnitude has not been quantified in a way that separates the planning component from the short-interval control component. The study aims to measure the share of productivity losses of a construction machinery set attributable to the interval between successive reallocations of resources, and to identify the disturbance sources that govern this share. Monte Carlo simulation was performed on an author's model of a set comprising two excavators with a 1.25 m³ bucket and nine 20-tonne dump trucks for an excavation volume of 68,430 m³; ten-day, shift-based and two-hour rescheduling were compared, and the contribution of individual disturbances was isolated by sequential deactivation. Shortening the rescheduling interval from ten days to two hours reduces the mean duration of the excavation from 60.77 to 55.61 shifts, raises the time utilization factor of the leading machines from 0.702 to 0.767 and compresses the standard deviation of duration from 4.85 to 1.62 shifts. Organizational downtime of the leading machine falls from 1.89 to 1,37 hours per shift, while the share of maintenance downtime remains near 4%. Haulage cycle variability accounts for 19,8% of the discrepancy, machine failures and loss of work face for more than four fifths. The time gain obtained coincides, within 0,2%, with the gain from adding a tenth dump truck under ten-day planning, which demonstrates the quantitative interchangeability of organizational coordination and physical fleet expansion. The lag between the arrival of data on the state of the machinery set and the recalculation of resource allocation thus constitutes an independent source of losses, separable from the technical condition of the machines and from the accuracy of estimating norms.

Keywords

construction operations management construction machinery set short-interval rescheduling discrete event simulation excavator operational productivity haulage availability organizational downtime machine hour estimating norms

References

Abramyan S.G., Burlachenko O.V., Oganesyan O.V., Asryan T.Sh. Improving the efficiency of construction site preparation through the application of information technologies // Volgograd State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering Bulletin. Series: Civil Engineering and Architecture. 2026. № 1 (102). pp. 141-151.

Bobrova T.V., Utkin V.A. Adjustment of technological chart parameters to the actual conditions of road construction by means of information modelling // Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal. 2025. Vol. 22. № 5. pp. 832-843.

Gorbaneva E., Preobrazhenskiy M., Bukhtoyarov A. Proactive and reactive planning of construction operations under external stochastic impacts // Academia. Architecture and Construction. 2025. № 3. pp. 153-161.

Kanishchev A.N., Borisov A.E., Zhabtsev A.V. Optimization of the road maintenance machinery fleet: parameters affecting the calculation of the operational productivity of machines and mechanisms // Russian Journal of Building Construction and Architecture. 2025. № 2 (78). pp. 98-105.

Kievskiy L.V. Construction scheduling with the use of S-functions // Industrial and Civil Engineering. 2025. № 12. pp. 4-10.

Lapidus A., Mikhaylova E. Entropy and dynamics of deviations in construction schedule management // News of Higher Educational Institutions. Construction. 2026. № 6 (810). pp. 85-97.

Manzhilevskaya S.E. Monitoring of labour productivity at a construction site with the help of machine learning algorithms // MSSU Bulletin. Monthly Journal on Construction and Architecture. 2026. Vol. 21. № 5. pp. 821-832.

Maslennikov V.A., Kanen M.G.F. Designing the organization of construction works performed by machine complexes // Volga State University of Technology Bulletin. Series: Materials. Constructions. Technologies. 2023. № 2 (26). pp. 68-77.

Mishchenko V., Gorbaneva E., Bukhtoyarov A. A scenario method for forecasting and dynamic adjustment of the construction schedule under stochastic impacts // News of Higher Educational Institutions. Construction. 2025. № 3 (795). pp. 87-101.

Oleynik P.P. Selection of construction machinery for the pioneer development of territories // Industrial and Civil Engineering. 2022. № 12. pp. 29-36.

Oparina L.A., Barzygin E.A., Ogurtsov V.A., Karas R.S. Combined application of the package-node method and artificial intelligence technologies in network scheduling of construction projects // Vestnik MGSU. Monthly Journal on Construction and Architecture. 2026. Vol. 21. № 1. pp. 107-121.

Salikhov R.F., Permyakov V.B. Study of the influence of technical parameter dynamics on the operational productivity of hydraulic single-bucket excavators // Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal. 2024. Vol. 21. № 4. pp. 540-560.

Salikhov R.F., Kuznetsova V.N., Kuznetsov I.S. Study of the operating intensity of hydraulic single-bucket excavators // The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal. 2025. Vol. 22. № 3. pp. 386-395.

Sokolnikov V.V., Molodtsov M.V. Informatization of construction operations organization and short-interval control // MSSU Bulletin. Monthly Journal on Construction and Architecture. 2024. Vol. 19. № 6. pp. 1006-1015.

Sui W., Rudenko A.A., Mikhaylov A.E. Risk assessment of construction projects based on Bayesian networks // Industrial and Civil Engineering. 2024. № 3. pp. 41-46.

Metrics

34 views
0 downloads
Want to publish with us?
Submit an article

Machine-readable metadata

Similar Articles

<< < 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.